See Treason, Report Treason
Last NWO Puppet, George Bush
February 13, 2010
Kevin Barrett speaks with Jonathan Mark and Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which will be celebrating passing the 1,000-signers mark next week in San Francisco!
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com
Jonathan, in consultation with Richard and other experts, is working on Misprision of Treason articles to be drafted and submitted to courts and local and state officials in compliance with USC 18 par.2382:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
According to this statute, anyone who knows about the treason committed by U.S. officials in orchestrating 9/11 and the 9/11 wars, and who does not report it, is a criminal who could face seven years in prison! Jonathan Mark and allies are asking people aware of the treason committed on or after 9/11 to obey the law and report what they know to a suitable authority. To help make this effort go viral, they are drafting suitable Misprision of Treason articles for mass distribution, which should be ready by the upcoming March 6th Treason in America conference.
eddieleaks.org 
So, by definition, if no treason ever existed, then no crimes of misprision existed.
So, if you have no evidence of treason, then why expect to find evidence of misprision of treason? It appears that you have a burden of proof that lingers over the head of 1000 people that represent less than .1% of all architects to find a specific amount of proof to support the allegation.
Until then, you have nothing but a 19th century lynching supported by fear, emotion, supposition, assumption, hearsay, and non-expert opinion. Why is it you claim explosives existed but have no proof? Who are your experts? A Professor of Folklore?
Why have you not presented a laundry list of real evidence to ANY Grand Jury? How is it that ALL you so-called evidence cannot pass a single Rules of Evidence hearing? Why is it that you cannot find a single explosives/demolition expert to support any of Gage’s claims? Why can’t you all find a single story line and stick to it. You have 30 different versions of your CT and cannot agree on which is true and which is even possible?
If you want questions, I can give you a list of questions that you need to answer before you can go to the public and ask for an indictment of Bush or any of his cronies. If you want these questions, you will need to get a group of experts to answer them, because they involve specifics about how explosives work, how demolition works, and how gravity works. Since you have none of these, you will be forced to rely on your old standby responses of name calling and evasive answers.
So, are you ready for tough questions? Or are you stuck preaching to a choir that refuses to corroborate a single claim you invent?
[…] Richard Gage, AIA and Jonathan Mark Truth Jihad Radio – 13 February 2010 – Misprision of […]